When potential conflicts arise between two merging companies, which of the following can be a solution?

Creating a transition team is an effective solution when potential conflicts arise between two merging companies because it facilitates collaboration and communication between the two organizations. This dedicated team can address specific integration challenges by bringing together key stakeholders from both companies, allowing them to collaboratively identify and resolve conflicts early in the process. By fostering an environment of teamwork and transparency, the transition team can help align goals, merge cultures, and develop a unified strategic approach, ultimately smoothing the merger process.

The transition team's role also encompasses overseeing the integration of systems, processes, and personnel, ensuring that issues are addressed in a coordinated manner. This approach not only mitigates tensions but also enhances the likelihood of a successful merger by promoting shared objectives and mutual understanding among employees.

In contrast, ignoring differences can exacerbate existing tensions, delaying resolution and complicating the integration process. Delaying the merger indefinitely introduces uncertainty and can lead to loss of momentum or interest from stakeholders, making the eventual merger more difficult. Maintaining separate operational structures can prevent the benefits of the merger from being realized, as it hinders synergies and efficiencies that could be gained from a unified approach.