How many out of 100 Mergers and Acquisitions deals does the U.S. government typically question on anti-competition grounds?

In the realm of Mergers and Acquisitions, the U.S. government primarily scrutinizes deals to ensure they do not violate antitrust laws and harm competition. The number that is commonly questioned on anti-competition grounds typically reflects a small portion of the total deals.

When looking at historical data, the figure often cited is that only about 1% of merger transactions are challenged by antitrust authorities in the U.S. This aligns with the correct answer, indicating that out of 100 deals, just 1 is typically scrutinized for potential anti-competitive outcomes. This low percentage suggests that while regulatory oversight is present, the majority of mergers do not raise significant concerns regarding market competition, allowing them to proceed without intervention.

In contrast, the higher figures in the other options do not accurately reflect the typical scrutiny level observed in practice. While the government may evaluate a larger initial pool of mergers, the actual number that leads to questioning or blocking on antitrust grounds is significantly lower.